Obviously, the borders seem to be an artistic choice designed to create a more cinematic tone (the PC version is the same), but the reasoning for the reduction in visibility on the PS3 is a little more puzzling to say the least: it's hard to imagine just how big a difference a mere 31 lines would make to overall performance. We're just a bit curious as to why this was done. In these segments the image is still being rendered in 720p on both formats, but the amount of visible screen-space occupied by the game differs between the two games - it's 1280x569 on the 3x538 on the PS3, with black borders at the top and bottom of the screen. Looking at the video, perhaps the most noticeable difference is in the game's pre-race and replay sequences. Sure enough, the 360 game does look a touch cleaner - foliage and sub-pixel details such as power lines don't shimmer quite as much - and certainly it's sharper, but the game's use of post processing effects and lighting style - at times using a softening bloom component - mean that the difference hardly impacts on the visuals negatively to any great extent. But as with DiRT 2, other elements in the visual make-up of the game help to bridge the gap between the two versions. Usually when QAA is employed we find that there is a distinct blurring of the visuals, covering both geometry edges and texture details. Looking at the visual make-up of the game, it appears that little has changed from previous EGO-fuelled racing games: we're looking at a native 720p rendering solution on both formats, along with 4x multi-sampling anti-aliasing (MSAA) on the 360, and Quincunx (QAA) on the PlayStation 3. See for yourself in an extensive DiRT 3 comparison gallery, and check out the head-to-head video.ĭiRT 3 head to head on 360 and PS3 - use the full screen button for 720p resolution, or click on the link below for a larger window. The baseline 30FPS update remains - although noticeable screen tearing is still present on the PS3 - while the game boasts some rather nice lighting in the form of a controlled use of bloom, and impressive reflections on the cars themselves. This is also an engine that has been skilfully deployed on multiple formats without much in the way of compromise: the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of the game are remarkably close to each other. However, as the end results are still so impressive, you can't really complain. There aren't really any major leaps forward to speak of though: it's more refinement as opposed to a visual revolution, and the lack of progress surrounding advanced terrain deformation is perhaps a tad disappointing. The tech powering the game, Codemasters' highly impressive EGO engine, remains a force to be reckoned with, generating lavishly detailed courses and a rather accomplished lighting solution which breathes life into the surrounding environments. Land Rushes, Head2Heads, and Rally Cross all make their return, while the inclusion of Gymkhana - a set of distinct challenges consisting of freestyle drifting, high speed jumps and more - provides a new hook for this third instalment.ĭiRT 3 feels both familiar and refreshed at the same time, but under the hood things haven't changed quite so dramatically. In DiRT 3 the focus is back onto traditional point-to-point rallying across terrain familiar to fans of the sport, though not without sacrificing the many enjoyable gameplay additions brought in with the second game. While controversy surrounded attempts to appeal to a mainstream audience with DiRT 2, there's a real sense with the sequel that Codemasters has recaptured the raw essence of car and driver that has felt rather a touch subdued since Colin McRae Rally adopted the DiRT moniker.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |